Who in an organization is responsible for the Virtual Desktop service?


You will be surprised at how many times thought provoking questions come up during conversations with prospects and customers!

A few days back, we were on a WebEx, presenting our virtual desktop monitoring solution to one of the major telcos. They had all the experts involved in the VDI rollout on the conference call – the network architects, the Citrix admins, the storage experts, the VMware architects, the Windows admins, etc. We had a good discussion on how the eG Enterprise VDI Monitoring solution could help them as they rollout VDI.

In the middle of this discussion, came a question that we had not anticipated – “Who do you think in our organization should own this Virtual Desktop Service?“. This was a very interesting question. Obviously as a supplier of products, we dont really get involved in how organizations must be organized to provide new services. These folks had obviously been thinking through how they would handle the VDI rollout.

The virtualization folks look at VDI as just VMs on top of a virtualization platform, whereas the Windows folks look at themselves providing the infrastructure services (DNS, DHCP, Domain access) and the backend applications (Exchange, SQL, etc.). The desktop group has expertise to manage the desktops but they dont really have any expertise with remote access technologies for desktops. That leaves the remote access group including mainly Citrix/terminal server administrators.

The Citrix/TS folks have been handling remote access issues over the years. They are familiar with some of the common issues in delivering desktops and applications over LANs and WANs (e.g., issues with printer drivers and printing in general, roaming profiles, performance slowdowns and disconnections mostly from network slowdowns). After all, VDI is supposed to be just another way to access applications remotely. Hence, we expect that as VDI matures, the remote access group will start to own the virtual desktop service delivery including the virtual desktops and the connection brokers, and they will rely on the other silos (virtualization platform, storage, network, etc.) to make this new service successful.

From a monitoring and management standpoint, the implication is that the remote access groups will seek solutions that can monitor Citrix, Terminal Services, and Virtual Desktops from a common interface, provide similar reports across these different access technologies, and reduce the learning curve by offering a consistent look and feel and usage paradigm across these technologies.

At eG Innovations, many of our large enterprise customers are already going down this path of using a common solution (eG Enterprise, of course!) to monitor their Citrix, terminal services, and virtual desktop infrastructures.

2 thoughts on “Who in an organization is responsible for the Virtual Desktop service?

  1. John Worthington February 3, 2010 / 3:32 pm

    While it’s been some time since I was at a telco, as I recall most had an Offer Management group or some other such function. These people were customer facing and established the market for a potential service; in ITIL terms, Service Strategy’s Service Level Packages (a defined level of Utility & Warranty).

    This is an important point, because taking an Outside-In approach will ensure that market needs are addressed for the target markets, and will impact Service Design.

    Hank Marquis wrote an article on ITSM Watch back in ’08 on SID — the Telemanagement Forum (TMF) New Generation Operations Systems and Software (NGOSS) Shared Information Data model.

    http://www.itsmwatch.com/itil/article.php/3722116

    I wonder what kind of market testing may be in order here, to validate customers’ perceptions and preferences for this kind of service. Once the Customer Facing Service is defined and agreed, the question of Service Ownership may be addressed.

    The Resource Facing Services (RFS) as described in Hank’s article are what add to the complexity here; it’s clear to me that the effectiveness and efficiency of the provider’s service organization will be dependent to a large degree on how they achieve a common operational interface across all RFS’s.

    This is a significant aspect of the eG solution.

  2. John Worthington February 9, 2010 / 5:24 pm

    Interesting article along the same lines….

    Who Owns Application Performance Management?

    at: http://advice.cio.com/david_mavashev/who_owns_application_performance_management

    The article suggests Application Owners. Perhaps a place to begin, but I will continue to suggest that defining business IT services — preferably based on business processes from an external customer perspective — is the most effective way to achieve this.

    Having done so, Service Owners can be established, and that’s where I believe ultimate ownership of APM belongs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s